Back to Blog

Porter's Five Forces Template: Industry Analysis Guide

Download our Porter's five forces template and learn how top consultants conduct competitive analysis. Step-by-step framework with scoring system and real examples.

David · Ex-BCG consultant and PowerPoint specialist with 8 years in strategy consultingOctober 10, 202520 min read

Porter's Five Forces is a framework for analyzing the competitive structure of an industry, developed by Harvard professor Michael Porter in 1979. It identifies five forces that determine industry profitability: threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of substitutes, and competitive rivalry.

Porter's Five Forces Framework

Porter's insight was that industry structure, not just company capabilities, drives profitability. A mediocre company in a favorable industry often outperforms an excellent company in a brutal industry. Understanding these forces tells you whether an industry is worth entering and how to position within it.

This guide covers how to analyze each force, the scoring framework consultants use to rate industry attractiveness, common mistakes that weaken the analysis, and how to present Five Forces in PowerPoint that drives strategic decisions. This framework comes from applying Five Forces analysis across 40+ market entry engagements, tracking which factors actually predicted competitive dynamics versus which were noise.

What Is Porter's Five Forces?#

The framework examines where value leaks from an industry. Each force represents a different way that profits get competed away, bargained away, or disrupted entirely. When consultants rate forces as "high," they're identifying structural threats to margins—not just competitive intensity, but the fundamental economics of the industry.

The five forces break down into two categories:

Horizontal competition (fighting for customers):

  1. Threat of New Entrants — How easily can new competitors enter?
  2. Threat of Substitutes — Can customers switch to alternatives?
  3. Industry Rivalry — How intense is competition among existing players?

Vertical pressure (value chain dynamics): 4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers — How much leverage do suppliers have? 5. Bargaining Power of Buyers — How much leverage do customers have?

ForceKey QuestionHigh = Bad For
New EntrantsHow easy is market entry?Existing players
Supplier PowerCan suppliers dictate terms?Buyers (your client)
Buyer PowerCan customers dictate terms?Sellers (your client)
SubstitutesAre alternatives available?Existing products
RivalryHow fierce is competition?All industry players

The collective strength of these forces determines how much profit potential exists in an industry. If all five forces are intense—like in the airline industry—almost no company earns attractive returns. If forces are mild—like in soft drinks—there's room for healthy margins.

Porter's Five Forces scoring framework infographic

The Five Forces Explained#

Before diving into each force, understand the underlying logic: every force represents a threat to your ability to capture value. Strong forces mean value leaks to suppliers, buyers, substitutes, new entrants, or gets competed away by rivals.

The framework examines three "horizontal" competitive forces—rivalry, new entrants, and substitutes—and two "vertical" forces—supplier power and buyer power.

Force TypeForces IncludedWhat It Analyzes
HorizontalRivalry, New Entrants, SubstitutesCompetition for customers
VerticalSupplier Power, Buyer PowerValue chain dynamics

Let's examine each force in detail.

Threat of New Entrants#

New entrants bring fresh capacity and a desire to gain market share. They put pressure on prices, costs, and investment rates necessary to compete.

What Determines Entry Threat?#

The threat of new entrants depends on barriers to entry and expected retaliation from incumbents.

Barrier TypeLow Threat (High Barrier)High Threat (Low Barrier)
Capital RequirementsHeavy upfront investment neededMinimal startup costs
Economies of ScaleLarge scale needed for competitive costsSmall players can compete profitably
Brand IdentityStrong customer loyalty to incumbentsCustomers easily switch to new brands
Switching CostsHigh cost for customers to changeEasy for customers to try new options
Distribution AccessChannels locked up by incumbentsMultiple distribution options available
Regulatory/LegalLicenses, patents protect incumbentsFew regulatory barriers
Expected RetaliationIncumbents known to fight hardPassive competitive response

Industry Examples#

Airlines — Low to Medium Threat

Despite appearing unattractive, new entrants do emerge. Low-cost carriers like Southwest, Ryanair, and EasyJet successfully entered by introducing innovative cost-cutting models. However, massive capital requirements for aircraft, airport slots, and regulatory licenses keep the barrier meaningful.

Software/SaaS — High Threat

Cloud infrastructure reduced capital requirements dramatically. A startup can launch a competing product with minimal investment. The main barriers are network effects and switching costs—which vary by category.

Consulting Application#

When assessing new entrant threat, ask:

  • What would it cost to enter this industry?
  • How long to reach competitive scale?
  • What would incumbents do in response?
  • Have any recent entrants succeeded or failed?

Bargaining Power of Suppliers#

Suppliers capture value by charging higher prices, limiting quality, or shifting costs to industry participants. Powerful suppliers squeeze industry profitability.

What Drives Supplier Power?#

FactorHigh Supplier PowerLow Supplier Power
ConcentrationFew suppliers dominateMany suppliers compete
Switching CostsExpensive to change suppliersEasy to switch
DifferentiationUnique inputs with no substitutesCommodity inputs
Forward IntegrationSuppliers could become competitorsUnlikely to integrate forward
Industry ImportanceYour industry is small customerYou're a major customer

Industry Examples#

Airlines — Very High Supplier Power

Airlines depend on two critical inputs: aircraft and fuel. Only Boeing and Airbus supply commercial aircraft—a duopoly with substantial pricing power. Fuel prices are set by global commodity markets beyond airline control.

Retail — Low Supplier Power

Major retailers like Walmart have thousands of suppliers competing for shelf space. Walmart's purchasing volume gives it leverage to demand favorable terms. Suppliers need Walmart more than Walmart needs any single supplier.

Consulting Application#

Map your client's supplier landscape:

  • Who are the top 5 suppliers by spend?
  • What's the concentration ratio?
  • Could suppliers integrate forward?
  • Are there alternative sources?

Bargaining Power of Buyers#

Buyers capture value by forcing prices down, demanding better quality or service, and playing competitors against each other.

What Drives Buyer Power?#

FactorHigh Buyer PowerLow Buyer Power
ConcentrationFew buyers purchase most volumeFragmented customer base
Switching CostsEasy to change suppliersHigh costs to switch
Price SensitivityHighly price-consciousValue-focused, less price sensitive
Product DifferentiationProducts are commoditizedUnique, differentiated offerings
Backward IntegrationBuyers could make it themselvesUnlikely to integrate backward
InformationFull price/cost transparencyInformation asymmetry

Industry Examples#

Airlines — High Buyer Power

Customers compare prices instantly through Skyscanner, Expedia, and Google Flights. Zero switching costs—passengers fly different carriers for each trip based purely on price. Business travelers have slightly lower price sensitivity but still compare options.

Enterprise Software — Low Buyer Power

Once a company implements an ERP system like SAP, switching costs are enormous. Years of data, customizations, trained employees, and integrated processes create lock-in. Vendors maintain pricing power with existing customers.

Consulting Application#

Segment buyers by power level:

  • Who are the largest customers?
  • What's customer concentration?
  • How easily can they switch?
  • What information do they have?

Threat of Substitutes#

Substitutes perform the same function as an industry's product through different means. They limit profit potential by placing a ceiling on prices.

What Determines Substitute Threat?#

FactorHigh Substitute ThreatLow Substitute Threat
Relative PriceSubstitutes offer better valueSubstitutes are more expensive
Switching CostsEasy to switch to alternativeHigh friction to change
Buyer PropensityCustomers open to alternativesStrong preference for current solution
PerformanceSubstitutes offer comparable qualitySubstitutes underperform

Industry Examples#

Airlines — Medium to High Threat

For short-haul routes: trains, buses, and cars substitute for flights. High-speed rail in Europe and Asia directly competes. Video conferencing substitutes for business travel—accelerated dramatically by remote work trends.

Smartphone Industry — Low Threat

What substitutes for a smartphone? Laptops handle some functions, but nothing replaces the combination of communication, computing, and portability in your pocket. The lack of substitutes supports Apple's pricing power.

Consulting Application#

Think broadly about substitutes:

  • What job does the product do for customers?
  • What else could accomplish that job?
  • How do substitute economics compare?
  • What trends affect substitute attractiveness?

Industry Rivalry#

Rivalry among existing competitors takes familiar forms: price discounting, new product introductions, advertising campaigns, and service improvements. High rivalry limits profitability.

What Drives Rivalry Intensity?#

FactorHigh RivalryLow Rivalry
Number of CompetitorsMany similarly sized playersFew dominant players
Industry GrowthSlow growth, fight for shareFast growth, room for all
Fixed CostsHigh fixed costs drive volume pressureVariable cost structure
Product DifferentiationCommoditized productsDifferentiated offerings
Exit BarriersHigh exit barriers trap capacityEasy to exit, capacity leaves
Strategic StakesHigh strategic importancePure financial investment

Industry Examples#

Airlines — Very High Rivalry

Multiple carriers compete on overlapping routes. High fixed costs (aircraft, gates) create pressure to fill seats at any price. Products are largely undifferentiated—a seat from A to B is similar across carriers. Exit barriers are high due to specialized assets and labor agreements.

Soft Drinks — Moderate Rivalry

Coca-Cola and Pepsi dominate with strong brands. Products are differentiated through brand identity. Neither company competes primarily on price. The duopoly structure limits destructive rivalry—both players understand that price wars hurt everyone.

Consulting Application#

Assess rivalry dynamics:

  • How many competitors? What's concentration?
  • What's industry growth rate?
  • How differentiated are products?
  • What's the competitive history?

Build consulting slides in seconds

Describe what you need. AI generates structured, polished slides — charts and visuals included.

When to Use Five Forces Analysis#

Five Forces is most valuable in specific strategic situations:

SituationHow Five Forces Helps
Market EntryAssess industry attractiveness before entering
M&A Due DiligenceEvaluate target's industry structure
Strategy DevelopmentIdentify forces to shape or exploit
Investment AnalysisUnderstand profit potential drivers
Competitive ResponseAnticipate competitor and stakeholder moves

When NOT to Use Five Forces#

The framework has limitations:

  • Company-level analysis: Five Forces examines industries, not individual companies
  • Rapid change: Static framework struggles with fast-moving industries
  • Isolated use: Should be combined with other frameworks like PESTEL or MECE structures
  • Too broad or narrow scope: Define the industry level correctly—not sector (too broad) or product (too narrow)

Porter himself emphasizes using Five Forces at the "line-of-business industry level"—the level where products compete directly.

How to Conduct Five Forces Analysis#

Here's our step-by-step process for Five Forces analysis:

Step 1: Define the Industry#

Be precise about scope. "Technology" is too broad. "Enterprise CRM software for mid-market companies" is appropriately specific.

Too BroadAppropriateToo Narrow
RetailGrocery retailOrganic produce at Whole Foods
TechnologyCloud infrastructureAWS S3 storage specifically
HealthcarePharmaceutical manufacturingOncology drugs in Brazil

Step 2: Identify the Players#

Map each force's participants:

  • New Entrants: Who's positioned to enter? Who's tried recently?
  • Suppliers: Who provides critical inputs? How concentrated?
  • Buyers: Who are customers? How concentrated? How price-sensitive?
  • Substitutes: What alternatives exist? How do economics compare?
  • Rivals: Who competes directly? What's market share distribution?

Step 3: Gather Evidence#

For each force, collect data on relevant factors. Use:

  • Industry reports and analyst research
  • Company filings and investor presentations
  • Expert interviews
  • Trade publications
  • Customer and supplier interviews

Step 4: Rate Each Force#

Using your evidence, rate each force as High, Medium, or Low. We use a structured scoring approach (detailed in the next section).

Step 5: Synthesize Implications#

The analysis isn't complete until you answer: "So what?"

  • What does industry structure mean for profitability?
  • Which forces most threaten your client?
  • What can be done to improve position?
  • How might forces evolve?

Step 6: Present Findings#

Structure your presentation with:

  1. Industry definition and context
  2. Five Forces diagram with ratings
  3. Deep-dive on each force with evidence
  4. Synthesis and strategic implications
  5. Recommendations

Rating and Scoring Forces#

We use a structured scoring framework to ensure consistent, defensible ratings.

Force Rating Framework#

For each force, assess multiple indicators and weight based on importance:

ForceKey IndicatorsWeight
New Entrants
Capital requirements25%
Economies of scale20%
Brand/loyalty barriers20%
Regulatory barriers15%
Access to distribution10%
Expected retaliation10%
Supplier Power
Supplier concentration30%
Switching costs25%
Input differentiation20%
Forward integration threat15%
Importance of volume10%
Buyer Power
Buyer concentration25%
Switching costs25%
Price sensitivity20%
Product differentiation15%
Backward integration threat15%
Substitutes
Relative price-performance35%
Switching costs25%
Buyer propensity25%
Substitute availability15%
Rivalry
Number of competitors20%
Industry growth20%
Fixed cost structure20%
Product differentiation20%
Exit barriers10%
Strategic stakes10%

Scoring Scale#

Rate each indicator on a 1-5 scale:

ScoreRatingMeaning
1Very LowMinimal threat/power
2LowBelow average threat/power
3MediumAverage threat/power
4HighAbove average threat/power
5Very HighSevere threat/power

Calculate Force Scores#

Multiply each indicator score by its weight, sum for total force score:

  • 1.0-2.0 = Low force (favorable)
  • 2.1-3.5 = Medium force (moderate)
  • 3.6-5.0 = High force (unfavorable)

Example Scoring: Airline Industry#

IndicatorScoreWeightWeighted
Supplier Power
Supplier concentration530%1.50
Switching costs425%1.00
Input differentiation420%0.80
Forward integration215%0.30
Volume importance310%0.30
Total3.90 (High)

This structured approach ensures your ratings are evidence-based and defensible in partner reviews.

Five Forces Best Practices#

1. Be Industry-Specific#

Generic analysis adds no value. Every statement should be backed by industry-specific evidence.

Weak: "Buyer power is high because customers can switch."

Strong: "Buyer power is high—price comparison sites like Skyscanner enable instant comparison across 500+ carriers, and our survey data shows 67% of leisure travelers prioritize price above all other factors."

2. Quantify Where Possible#

Numbers strengthen analysis and make ratings defensible.

QualitativeQuantitative
"Many competitors""Top 5 players hold 85% market share"
"Low switching costs""Average customer acquisition cost is $50; churn rate is 15% annually"
"High capital requirements""$500M minimum investment for competitive scale"

3. Consider Force Interactions#

Forces don't operate independently. Supplier power affects rivalry (shared cost pressures). New entrant threat depends on buyer loyalty (which affects buyer power).

4. Look Forward, Not Just Backward#

Current structure matters, but trends matter more. How are forces evolving?

  • Technology changes reducing entry barriers?
  • Consolidation increasing supplier power?
  • New substitutes emerging?

5. Connect to Strategy#

The analysis should inform action. End every Five Forces presentation with "implications" and "recommendations."

Common Five Forces Mistakes#

Mistake 1: Confusing Industry and Company Analysis#

Five Forces analyzes industries, not companies. "Apple has strong brand loyalty" is a company observation. "Consumer electronics buyers have low switching costs" is an industry observation.

Mistake 2: Listing Without Analyzing#

We've seen countless Five Forces slides that list factors without assessing their impact or rating their strength. Every factor needs: evidence, rating, and implication.

Mistake 3: Static Snapshot#

Presenting current state without discussing how forces are changing misses half the value. Always include trend arrows.

Mistake 4: Wrong Industry Definition#

Too broad (all retail) misses segment differences. Too narrow (one product line) lacks strategic relevance. Define at the competitive market level.

Mistake 5: Ignoring Complementors#

Porter's original framework has been extended to include "complementors"—products that enhance your offering's value. For PC makers, software is a complement. Consider whether complementor dynamics matter for your industry.

Mistake 6: Superficial Evidence#

"Barriers to entry are high" isn't analysis. Specify which barriers, how high, and what evidence supports the claim.

Creating Five Forces in PowerPoint#

Slide Structure#

A complete Five Forces presentation typically includes:

  1. Title slide — Industry and analysis scope
  2. Overview slide — Five Forces diagram with summary ratings
  3. Force deep-dives — One slide per force with evidence
  4. Synthesis slide — What does this mean for profitability?
  5. Implications slide — Strategic recommendations

The Central Diagram#

The classic Five Forces diagram shows:

  • Central box: Industry Rivalry
  • Four surrounding boxes: Suppliers (left), Buyers (right), New Entrants (top), Substitutes (bottom)
  • Arrows pointing inward showing pressure direction

Color-code by rating:

  • Green = Low (favorable)
  • Yellow = Medium (moderate)
  • Red = High (unfavorable)

Formatting Standards#

Follow consulting slide standards:

  • Clean, minimal design
  • Consistent fonts and colors
  • Clear visual hierarchy
  • Evidence in supporting bullets

For diagram creation, tools like Deckary help build consistent strategic frameworks with proper alignment and formatting. The icon library includes business strategy icons useful for Five Forces diagrams.

Force Detail Slides#

Each force deserves a dedicated slide:

Structure:

  • Force name and rating (H/M/L) in title
  • Key indicators with evidence bullets
  • Trend arrow showing direction
  • Implications in action title

Example title: "Supplier Power is HIGH and increasing due to Boeing/Airbus duopoly"

Real-World Five Forces Examples#

Example 1: Airline Industry#

The airline industry demonstrates how powerful forces destroy profitability.

ForceRatingKey Evidence
New EntrantsMedium$500M+ capital requirements, but low-cost carrier success shows entry is possible
Supplier PowerVery HighBoeing/Airbus duopoly; fuel prices beyond control
Buyer PowerHighPrice comparison sites; zero switching costs; 67% price-first customers
SubstitutesMedium-HighHigh-speed rail; video conferencing; car travel for short routes
RivalryVery High10+ major carriers per region; undifferentiated product; high fixed costs

Synthesis: Four of five forces are unfavorable. Industry profitability is structurally challenged. Success requires cost leadership (Southwest model) or differentiation (premium carriers).

Example 2: Enterprise Software (SaaS)#

Enterprise SaaS shows more favorable industry structure.

ForceRatingKey Evidence
New EntrantsMedium-HighLow capital requirements, but network effects and switching costs protect incumbents
Supplier PowerLowCloud infrastructure (AWS, Azure, GCP) is competitive; talent is the main constraint
Buyer PowerLow-MediumHigh switching costs once implemented; 3-5 year contracts common
SubstitutesLowCustom development is expensive; few alternatives for enterprise needs
RivalryMediumCategory leaders (Salesforce, Workday) hold strong positions; growth reduces share battles

Synthesis: Favorable structure supports strong margins. Switching costs and differentiation protect incumbents. Key strategic focus: land and expand.

Example 3: Retail Grocery#

Grocery retail illustrates mixed forces and regional variation.

ForceRatingKey Evidence
New EntrantsMediumAmazon/Whole Foods disrupted; but scale economics and real estate create barriers
Supplier PowerLowFragmented supplier base; retailers hold shelf space leverage
Buyer PowerHighPrice-sensitive customers; easy to switch stores; weekly purchase decisions
SubstitutesLow-MediumRestaurant delivery growing; meal kits emerged but plateaued
RivalryHighWalmart, Costco, regional chains compete intensely; low margins industry-wide

Synthesis: High buyer power and rivalry compress margins. Winners need scale (Walmart) or differentiation (Trader Joe's, Whole Foods).

Five Forces vs Other Frameworks#

Five Forces vs SWOT#

DimensionFive ForcesSWOT
FocusExternal industry structureInternal + external factors
LevelIndustryCompany
OutputIndustry attractivenessCompany positioning
Best ForMarket entry, industry analysisStrategy formulation, quick assessment

Use Five Forces for industry analysis, SWOT for company-specific strategy.

Five Forces vs PESTEL#

DimensionFive ForcesPESTEL
FocusIndustry competitive dynamicsMacro-environmental factors
FactorsCompetitors, suppliers, buyersPolitical, Economic, Social, Tech, Environmental, Legal
Time HorizonCurrent structureLong-term trends
Best ForCompetitive strategyScenario planning, market entry

Use PESTEL for macro trends, Five Forces for competitive dynamics. They complement each other well.

Five Forces vs Value Chain#

DimensionFive ForcesValue Chain
FocusIndustry structureCompany activities
PurposeUnderstand profit potentialIdentify competitive advantage
OutputForce ratingsCost/differentiation sources
Best ForIndustry attractivenessOperational strategy

Five Forces tells you if the industry is attractive. Value Chain tells you how to win within it.

Combining Frameworks#

In practice, consultants combine multiple frameworks. A comprehensive industry analysis might include:

  1. PESTEL — Macro-environmental context
  2. Five Forces — Industry competitive dynamics
  3. Value Chain — How value is created and captured
  4. MECE Issue Trees — Structure for specific strategic questions

Summary#

Porter's Five Forces remains the foundational framework for industry analysis four decades after its introduction. Used correctly, it reveals why some industries are profitable and others aren't—and what companies can do about it.

Key principles:

  1. Five forces determine industry profitability: New entrants, suppliers, buyers, substitutes, and rivalry
  2. Rate each force High/Medium/Low based on specific indicators and evidence
  3. Industry structure shapes company performance more than most realize
  4. Analysis must drive strategy — identify forces to exploit, shape, or mitigate
  5. Combine with other frameworks for comprehensive strategic analysis

For consulting presentations:

  • Define industry scope precisely
  • Use structured scoring for defensible ratings
  • Quantify wherever possible
  • Show trends, not just current state
  • Connect analysis to strategic implications

The framework is simple. The value comes from rigorous application and insight generation. A well-executed Five Forces analysis tells a story about industry economics that shapes strategic decisions.

That's what separates a diagram from an analysis.

Build consulting slides in seconds

Describe what you need. AI generates structured, polished slides — charts and visuals included.

Try Free