Best AI Presentation Makers 2026: 12 Tools Tested

The AI presentation market exploded in 2025. Gamma reached 70 million users and a $2.1 billion valuation. Tome raised $81 million then shut down its presentation product entirely. Microsoft added Copilot to PowerPoint. Canva embedded AI throughout its platform.

With so many options now available, choosing the right AI presentation maker has become genuinely difficult.

We tested 12 AI presentation tools over six months, creating 200+ presentations across strategy consulting, marketing, investor pitches, and internal communications. We measured generation quality, export reliability, editing capabilities, and real-world workflow fit.

This guide provides honest assessments of each tool—what works, what doesn't, and which tool fits different use cases.

Quick Comparison: AI Presentation Makers at a Glance#

Our Testing Methodology#

We evaluated each tool using real consulting and business workflows:

• Presentations created: 15-20 per tool across different use cases
• Content types: Strategy decks, pitch decks, quarterly reports, training materials
• Export testing: PowerPoint export quality and cleanup time required
• Edit workflow: Ability to iterate on existing content
• Platforms: Windows 11 and macOS Sonoma
• Time tracked: Generation time, editing time, export cleanup time

For each tool, we documented output quality, workflow friction, and total time from prompt to presentation-ready output.

The 12 Best AI Presentation Makers#

1. Gamma — Best Overall for Most Users#

Rating: 4.5/5

Website: gamma.app

Gamma has become the dominant player in AI presentations, reaching 70 million users and $100 million in annual revenue while remaining profitable. The platform generates complete presentations from simple prompts, with modern card-based layouts that look impressive immediately.

Key features:

• AI presentation generation from text prompts
• Card-based scrollable format (unique approach)
• AI image generation and editing
• Real-time collaboration
• Gamma Agent for research and design assistance
• Web-based sharing with analytics

What it does well:

• Fast generation: Complete decks in 2-3 minutes
• Modern aesthetic: Clean, professional designs
• Continuous improvement: Regular feature updates
• Interactive elements: Polls, embeds, GIFs supported

What it doesn't do:

• Native PowerPoint: Exports often have formatting issues
• Edit existing decks: Designed for creation, not iteration
• Consulting charts: No waterfall, Mekko, or Gantt charts
• Offline access: Requires internet connection

Pricing:

• Free: 400 credits (roughly 10 presentations)
• Plus: $8/month (more credits, remove branding)
• Pro: $18/month (unlimited generation, premium features)
• Ultra: $100/month (advanced AI models, API access)

Our testing results: Gamma consistently produced the most visually polished presentations out of the box. However, when we exported to PowerPoint (required for 80% of our consulting work), cleanup took 15-45 minutes per deck. Fonts substituted, layouts shifted, and aspect ratios required adjustment.

Best for: Marketing teams, educators, startup founders, and anyone creating standalone presentations for web viewing who don't need PowerPoint output.

---

2. Deckary — Best for Consultants#

Rating: 4.5/5

Website: deckary.com

Deckary takes the opposite approach from web-based tools: it works as a PowerPoint add-in, generating AI slides directly inside your existing presentations. For consultants who live in PowerPoint—editing client decks, iterating on partner feedback, working within approved templates—this eliminates the export-import cycle entirely.

Key features:

• AI slide generation inside PowerPoint
• Consulting-grade charts: Waterfall, Mekko, Gantt
• Excel-linked charts with automatic updates
• 600+ icon library built into PowerPoint
• Keyboard shortcuts for alignment and distribution
• Works on Windows and Mac

What it does well:

• No export step: Slides are already in PowerPoint
• Existing deck support: Works on client-provided files
• Consulting-specific: MBB-style slide structures
• Flat-rate pricing: No credit calculations

What it doesn't do:

• Web-based sharing: No direct link sharing
• Interactive elements: Traditional slides only
• Card format: Standard PowerPoint slides

Pricing:

• Starter: $49/year (basic features)
• Premium: $119/year (all features including AI)
• Lifetime: $199 (one-time payment)

Our testing results:

• Slide generation: 30-60 seconds average
• Export required: None
• Cleanup time: Zero
• Excel link success rate: 100% across 120+ updates

Creating the same waterfall chart in Deckary and Gamma: Deckary took 35 seconds and produced a native PowerPoint chart. Gamma took 45 seconds but required an additional 20 minutes of cleanup after export to get the chart looking correct in PowerPoint.

Best for: Consultants at MBB, Big 4, and investment banks who work primarily in PowerPoint and need to iterate on existing decks. If your final deliverable must be a polished .pptx file, Deckary eliminates workflow friction.

---

3. Beautiful.ai — Best for Design-First Teams#

Rating: 4/5

Website: beautiful.ai

Beautiful.ai focuses on automated design rather than content generation. The platform's Smart Slide templates automatically adjust layouts, spacing, and typography as you add content—useful for teams without design expertise.

Key features:

• Smart Slides with automatic layout adjustment
• Brand theme enforcement
• Real-time collaboration
• AI-powered design suggestions
• PowerPoint export

What it does well:

• Consistent design: Templates maintain professional look
• Easy for non-designers: Less manual formatting
• Team collaboration: Shared brand assets
• Reasonable export quality: Cleaner than Gamma

What it doesn't do:

• Native PowerPoint: Export-only approach
• Advanced charts: Basic chart types only
• Edit existing files: Creates new presentations only

Pricing:

• Pro: $12/month (billed annually)
• Team: $40/user/month (billed annually)
• Enterprise: Custom pricing
• Single presentation: $45 one-time

Our testing results: Beautiful.ai produced cleaner PowerPoint exports than Gamma, requiring only 10-15 minutes of cleanup versus 30-45 minutes. The design quality was consistently high, but the platform struggled with data-heavy presentations requiring complex charts.

Best for: Marketing teams creating brand-consistent presentations who don't need to iterate on external PowerPoint files.

---

4. Plus AI — Best for Google Slides Users#

Rating: 4/5

Website: plusai.com

Plus AI works as an add-on for Google Slides and PowerPoint, generating native slides without export steps. If your organization uses Google Workspace, Plus AI integrates seamlessly with existing workflows.

Key features:

• Works in Google Slides (primary) and PowerPoint
• Generates native slides
• Edit existing presentations
• Document upload for content generation
• AI-powered content suggestions

What it does well:

• Native integration: No export needed
• Works on existing decks: Add slides to current presentations
• Document processing: Upload PDFs, DOCX for content
• Team collaboration: Google Workspace integration

What it doesn't do:

• Consulting charts: Basic chart types only
• PowerPoint-first: Google Slides is primary platform
• Advanced formatting: Limited customization options

Pricing:

• Basic: $10-15/month (unlimited generation)
• Pro: $20-25/month (document uploads, AI images)
• Team: $40/month (custom branding, presets)

Our testing results: Plus AI performed well for straightforward text slides in Google Slides. The PowerPoint integration felt secondary. For data-heavy consulting work, we needed to supplement with other tools for specialized charts.

Best for: Google Workspace organizations who want AI assistance without switching platforms or learning new tools.

---

5. Microsoft Copilot for PowerPoint — Best for Microsoft 365 Users#

Rating: 3.5/5

Website: microsoft.com/copilot

Microsoft's Copilot adds AI capabilities directly to PowerPoint. Available with Microsoft 365 Copilot subscriptions, it generates slides from prompts and helps edit existing content.

Key features:

• Native PowerPoint integration
• AI slide generation from prompts
• Works on existing presentations
• Microsoft ecosystem integration
• Designer integration for layout suggestions

What it does well:

• Fully integrated: No add-ins or external platforms
• Works on existing decks: Add content to current files
• Microsoft support: Regular updates and improvements
• Enterprise features: Security, compliance, admin controls

What it doesn't do:

• Consulting-grade output: Generic slides need heavy formatting
• Advanced charts: Basic chart types only
• Design automation: Less polished than dedicated tools

Pricing:

• Copilot Business: $18-21/user/month (SMB)
• Copilot Enterprise: $30/user/month (on top of Microsoft 365)
• Personal: Included with $10-20/month Microsoft 365 subscriptions

Our testing results: Copilot is improving but still generates generic slides that require significant formatting to meet consulting standards. It's helpful for drafting initial content but not for final deliverables. The main value is convenience for organizations already paying for Microsoft 365 Copilot.

Best for: Enterprises already invested in Microsoft 365 Copilot who want AI assistance without additional tools or training.

---

6. Canva — Best Free Option with AI#

Rating: 4/5

Website: canva.com

Canva's Magic Design uses AI to generate presentations from text prompts. As part of Canva's broader design ecosystem, it benefits from the platform's extensive template library and asset collection.

Key features:

• AI presentation generation (Magic Design)
• Massive template library
• Built-in stock photos, icons, graphics
• Collaboration features
• Multi-format export (PPT, PDF, video)
• Translation to 100+ languages

What it does well:

• Free tier: Generous AI features without payment
• Template variety: Thousands of starting points
• Design assets: Integrated stock media
• Versatility: Presentations plus all other design needs

What it doesn't do:

• PowerPoint native: Export-only approach
• Business presentations: Templates skew creative
• Advanced charts: Basic visualization options

Pricing:

• Free: AI features with usage limits
• Pro: $120/year ($15/month billed annually)
• Teams: $100/user/year ($10/user/month, 3-user minimum)

Our testing results: Canva produces attractive presentations quickly, especially for creative or marketing content. The AI suggestions were relevant but sometimes generic. Export to PowerPoint was clean for simple slides but complex layouts required adjustments.

Best for: Non-designers who need versatile design capabilities beyond presentations, especially those comfortable with web-based tools.

---

7. Prezi — Best for Non-Linear Presentations#

Rating: 3.5/5

Website: prezi.com

Prezi pioneered zoomable, non-linear presentations. The AI features now help generate content within this unique format, creating presentations that stand out from traditional slide-by-slide approaches.

Key features:

• Zoomable canvas (unique visual approach)
• AI presentation generation
• AI text refinement
• Video presentation tools
• PowerPoint/PDF import

What it does well:

• Distinctive format: Memorable zooming effects
• Engagement: Good for storytelling
• Video integration: Built-in recording tools
• Import existing slides: Convert PowerPoint to Prezi

What it doesn't do:

• Traditional format: The zooming may not suit all contexts
• Business presentations: Can feel too "creative" for boardrooms
• Native PowerPoint: Exports lose the zooming effect

Pricing:

• Basic: Free (limited features)
• Standard: $7/month (annual)
• Plus: $19/month (annual, most popular)
• Teams: $29/user/month (annual)

Our testing results: Prezi's AI generation produced visually engaging content, but the zooming format felt inappropriate for client-facing consulting presentations. When exported to PowerPoint, the unique navigation was lost, leaving standard slides. The tool excels for internal presentations and educational content.

Best for: Educators, trainers, and internal presentations where distinctive visuals matter more than traditional format compliance.

---

8. SlidesAI — Best Budget Option#

Rating: 3/5

Website: slidesai.io

SlidesAI focuses on Google Slides, offering a budget-friendly way to generate presentations from text. The free tier provides real value for occasional users.

Key features:

• Google Slides integration
• Generate from text or documents
• Multiple theme options
• Video export

What it does well:

• Budget-friendly: Meaningful free tier
• Simple interface: Easy to learn
• Google integration: Works in familiar environment

What it doesn't do:

• PowerPoint native: Google Slides only (PowerPoint version in development)
• Advanced features: Basic generation capabilities
• Complex visualizations: Limited chart support

Pricing:

• Basic: Free (3 presentations/month)
• Pro: $8/month (10 presentations/month)
• Premium: $15/month (unlimited presentations)

Our testing results: SlidesAI is functional for basic presentations but lacks the polish of premium tools. Output quality was acceptable for internal use but not client-ready without significant manual improvement.

Best for: Students, educators, and budget-conscious users who primarily work in Google Slides.

---

9. Pitch — Best for Startup Teams#

Rating: 3.5/5

Website: pitch.com

Pitch combines presentation creation with team collaboration features, positioning itself for fast-moving startup teams who need to create and share decks quickly.

Key features:

• Real-time collaboration
• AI-powered slide creation
• Analytics on presentation views
• Video recording built-in
• Custom branding tools

What it does well:

• Team collaboration: Strong multi-user features
• Analytics: Track who viewed presentations
• Startup templates: Pitch deck focused
• Speed: Fast generation and iteration

What it doesn't do:

• PowerPoint integration: Separate platform
• Enterprise features: Positioned for smaller teams
• Consulting-specific: General business focus

Pricing:

• Free: Limited features
• Pro: ~$8/month (per user, annual)
• Business: Custom pricing

Our testing results: Pitch excels for teams creating investor presentations collaboratively. The AI features are competent but not class-leading. Export to PowerPoint worked reasonably well for simple slides.

Best for: Startup teams who create pitch decks frequently and value collaboration features.

---

10. Visme — Best for Infographics#

Rating: 3.5/5

Website: visme.co

Visme positions itself as a visual content platform, with presentations as one output among infographics, reports, and other visual content.

Key features:

• AI presentation generation
• AI image generation
• Infographic templates
• Data visualization widgets
• Interactivity options

What it does well:

• Visual variety: Beyond standard presentations
• Data widgets: Interactive charts and graphs
• Brand management: Consistent visual identity
• Animation: Engaging visual effects

What it doesn't do:

• PowerPoint native: Export-only
• Simplicity: Learning curve for full features
• Consulting focus: Marketing-oriented

Pricing:

• Starter: $12.25/month (annual)
• Pro: $24.75/month (annual, full AI)
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Our testing results: Visme's strength is visual diversity—infographics, data visualizations, and interactive content. For standard business presentations, other tools proved more efficient. Export to PowerPoint was clean but lost interactive elements.

Best for: Marketing teams creating diverse visual content beyond standard presentations.

---

11. Slidebean — Best for Pitch Deck Templates#

Rating: 3/5

Website: slidebean.com

Slidebean targets startups with AI-powered pitch deck creation and additional services like pitch deck review and financial modeling assistance.

Key features:

• AI-powered design from content
• Pitch deck focused templates
• Expert review services (paid)
• Financial modeling assistance
• Analytics on deck views

What it does well:

• Pitch deck focus: Templates designed for fundraising
• Expert services: Human review available
• Startup-friendly: Understands investor needs

What it doesn't do:

• General presentations: Narrow focus
• Enterprise features: Startup-scale
• Advanced AI: Less sophisticated generation

Pricing:

• Free: Create decks (pay to export)
• All-Access: ~$8-19/month (annual)

Our testing results: Slidebean works well for its specific niche—startup pitch decks. The AI suggestions were relevant for fundraising content. For general business presentations, the narrow focus became limiting.

Best for: Early-stage startups creating investor pitch decks who may benefit from additional expert services.

---

12. GenPPT — Best for Research-Heavy Presentations#

Rating: 3/5

Website: genppt.com

GenPPT differentiates by using advanced AI models (including Claude and Gemini) to research topics before generating slides, producing more substantive content.

Key features:

• Research-first approach
• Multiple AI model options
• Deeper content generation
• Topic exploration

What it does well:

• Content depth: More thorough than simple prompts
• Research integration: Pulls relevant information
• Model flexibility: Access to latest AI capabilities

What it doesn't do:

• Design focus: Less polished visuals
• Platform integration: Standalone tool
• Widespread adoption: Smaller user base

Pricing: Varies by usage

Our testing results: GenPPT produced more substantive content than tools that just format prompts. However, the design quality lagged behind Gamma and Beautiful.ai. Best for presentations where content depth matters more than visual polish.

Best for: Users who need AI to research topics and generate substantive content, not just format existing ideas.

---

What Happened to Tome?#

If you're looking for Tome, it no longer offers presentation features. Tome was an early AI presentation pioneer, reaching 1 million users within four months and raising $81 million in funding. However, the company struggled with monetization—ARR remained under $4 million despite massive user growth.

In October 2024, Tome pivoted to sales automation. By March 2025, the presentation product was officially sunset. AngelList subsequently acquired the Tome brand and some technology assets.

Former Tome users have typically migrated to Gamma (most similar aesthetic), Beautiful.ai (design-focused), or PowerPoint-native alternatives like Deckary.

---

How to Choose the Right AI Presentation Maker#

Choose by Use Case#

For consultants and professional services:

• Deckary — PowerPoint native, consulting-grade charts, works on existing decks
• Microsoft Copilot — If already paying for Microsoft 365 Copilot

For marketing and creative teams:

• Beautiful.ai — Design automation, brand consistency
• Canva — Versatile design platform, strong free tier
• Visme — When you need infographics too

For startup pitch decks:

• Gamma — Best initial quality for standalone presentations
• Pitch — Team collaboration, pitch-specific features
• Slidebean — Pitch deck templates with expert services

For Google Workspace organizations:

• Plus AI — Native Google Slides integration
• SlidesAI — Budget-friendly option

For educators and trainers:

• Prezi — Distinctive zooming format, engaging visuals
• Canva — Easy to use, massive template library

Choose by Primary Requirement#

The Export Problem: Why Platform Matters#

The biggest hidden cost in AI presentation tools is export cleanup time. Web-based tools like Gamma create presentations in their own format. When you export to PowerPoint—which most business contexts require—formatting issues appear:

• Fonts substitute incorrectly
• Layouts shift and break
• Colors change slightly
• Text boxes overlap
• Charts lose formatting

In our testing, export cleanup added 15-60 minutes per presentation for web-based tools. PowerPoint-native tools (Deckary, Plus AI, Copilot) eliminate this step entirely.

If your final deliverable is a .pptx file, factor export cleanup time into your tool choice.

Pricing Comparison Summary#

The Bottom Line#

The AI presentation landscape has matured significantly. The best tool depends on your specific workflow:

For most users creating standalone presentations: Gamma offers the best balance of speed, quality, and features. The 70 million users and $100 million in revenue validate the product-market fit.

For consultants and professionals who need PowerPoint output: Deckary eliminates the export-import cycle by working directly inside PowerPoint. The consulting-grade charts (waterfall, Mekko, Gantt) address specific professional needs that general tools miss.

For teams on tight budgets: Canva's free tier provides genuine value, and SlidesAI offers a functional budget option for Google Slides users.

For Microsoft 365 organizations: Copilot's native integration may justify the cost despite less polished initial output.

The best approach: try 2-3 tools with your actual workflow. Most offer free trials. Create the same presentation in each and measure total time—including any export cleanup—to reach a final deliverable.