
Free Strategic Pillars PowerPoint Template
Part of our 143 template library. Install the free add-in to use it directly in PowerPoint.
What's Included
How to Use This Template
- 1Define your central strategy in the pyramid apex
- 2Identify 5-7 strategic pillars as column headers
- 3List 3-4 key considerations under each pillar
- 4Use checkboxes to indicate status or priority
- 5Ensure pillars are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive
- 6Write an action title stating the strategic direction
When to Use This Template
- Strategy formulation presentations
- Operating model design
- Transformation program planning
- Capability maturity assessments
- Strategic planning workshops
- Board strategy reviews
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Creating overlapping pillars that confuse the structure
- Using too many pillars (7 is the practical maximum)
- Mixing different levels of abstraction across pillars
- Forgetting to show how pillars connect to central strategy
- Including pillars that are actually initiatives, not themes
Use This Template in PowerPoint
Get the Strategic Pillars Template and 142 other consulting-grade templates with the free Deckary add-in.
Get Started FreeFree plan available. No credit card required.
Strategic Pillars Template FAQs
Common questions about the strategic pillars template
Related Templates
Building Strategy on Solid Pillars
Strategy is complex. Strategic communication shouldn't be. The strategic pillars framework transforms multi-dimensional strategy into a clear visual structure that executives, boards, and employees can understand and remember.
Our template provides a seven-column layout with a pyramid visualization connecting pillars to the central strategy. Each pillar can hold multiple considerations—the specific elements that must be addressed within each strategic theme. The result is a comprehensive yet scannable strategy map.
The Architecture of Strategic Pillars
Think of strategic pillars as the structural supports of a building. The roof is your vision or strategic objective. The pillars hold it up. If any pillar is weak, the structure is compromised. If pillars overlap, you have redundancy without added strength.
The pyramid apex holds your central strategy—the overarching objective or vision that everything else supports. This might be "Become the market leader in sustainable packaging" or "Achieve $500M revenue with 20% operating margins."
The column headers name each pillar. These should be strategic themes, not initiatives or tactics. Good pillar names are durable—they shouldn't change every quarter. Examples: "Commercial Excellence," "Operational Efficiency," "People & Culture," "Digital Foundation," "Customer Experience."
The consideration rows detail what must happen within each pillar. These are more specific than the pillar name but more strategic than individual projects. They answer: "What must be true for this pillar to be strong?"
Designing Mutually Exclusive Pillars
The most common mistake in pillar design is overlap. When "Digital Transformation" and "Customer Experience" both include mobile app development, you have a structural problem. Initiatives will be double-counted, ownership will be confused, and resources will be contested.
Test your pillars with this question: "If I have a new initiative, can I unambiguously assign it to exactly one pillar?" If initiatives consistently fit multiple pillars, you need to redraw your boundaries.
One technique: define each pillar by the primary resource or capability it governs. "Technology" governs engineering resources. "Commercial" governs sales and marketing. "Operations" governs manufacturing and supply chain. This creates natural boundaries.
Ensuring Collective Exhaustiveness
Mutually exclusive isn't enough. Your pillars must also be collectively exhaustive—together they should cover the full scope of your strategy. Any important strategic initiative should fit within a pillar.
Test this by listing your top 10-15 strategic priorities. Can each one be mapped to a pillar? If you have orphan items that don't fit anywhere, you're missing a pillar or need to expand an existing one.
Common gaps include: technology/digital (often underleveraged as a standalone pillar), people/culture (frequently forgotten in operational strategies), risk/compliance (critical but unsexy), and geographic expansion (when the strategy is implicitly single-market).
Writing Effective Considerations
Considerations are the connective tissue between abstract pillars and concrete initiatives. They should be specific enough to guide action but stable enough to last a planning cycle.
Too abstract: "Improve customer relationships" Too specific: "Deploy Salesforce CRM by Q3" Just right: "Establish unified customer data platform enabling 360-degree relationship view"
Good considerations answer: What capability do we need? What outcome must we achieve? What principle should guide decisions within this pillar?
Aim for 3-4 considerations per pillar. More than that suggests you're mixing abstraction levels or that the pillar should be split. Fewer than that suggests the pillar may not warrant standalone status.
Using Checkboxes for Status or Priority
The checkbox indicators in each row serve multiple purposes depending on context:
Status tracking: Check items that are fully addressed or in progress. Leave unchecked items that are planned but not yet started. This turns the pillars slide into a strategy execution dashboard.
Priority indication: Check the highest-priority consideration within each pillar. This helps focus discussion on what matters most.
Maturity assessment: Check items where your organization is strong; leave unchecked where gaps exist. This creates a visual capability heat map.
Define how you're using checkboxes before the presentation, and include a legend if the usage isn't obvious.
Presenting the Seven-Pillar Framework
Seven columns is the practical maximum for this format. Beyond that, text becomes too small and the visual becomes overwhelming. If you genuinely have more than seven strategic themes, consider:
Grouping: Combine related pillars into 3-4 "super-pillars" with sub-themes Sequencing: Use multiple slides, with each slide focusing on a pillar group Simplifying: Challenge whether all themes are truly strategic pillars versus supporting capabilities
When presenting, don't read every consideration. Highlight 1-2 items per pillar that merit discussion. Use the visual as a reference map, not a script.
From Pillars to Execution
The strategic pillars template provides strategic architecture. Execution requires additional detail.
Use the strategic initiatives template to map specific projects to your pillars. This creates traceability from strategy to action.
Use the impact-effort matrix to prioritize initiatives within and across pillars when resources are constrained.
For presenting final recommendations, the recommendations list template distills pillars into actionable next steps.
The pillars framework is particularly powerful for annual strategy reviews, board presentations, and organizational alignment sessions where the audience needs to see the full strategic picture on a single page.
For the full collection of strategy frameworks that inform pillar development, see our Strategic Frameworks Guide. For structuring stakeholder communication around your pillars, explore our Stakeholder Management Guide.


